NATIONAL COMMUNISM (SULTANGALIEVISM) AND NATIONAL DEMOCRACY (KEMALISM) AS TWO VERSIONS OF MODERNIZATION OF THE TURKIC AND MUSLIM WORLD ARTICLE 1.

Author(s): 
List of sections: 
History - Open specialized section
Mounth / Year: 
2016, June
Issue of the journal: 
9
Pages: 
5
Type of the article: 
Scientific article
Abstract: 

The author considers the ideological trends of first third of the XX century – “National Communism” in Russia and “National Democracy” in Turkey. An attempt is made to present Sultangalievism and Kemalism as two versions of modernization of the Turkic and Muslim world.

Keywords: 
Turkic world (the Turks), modernization, democracy, socialism, national communism, Sultangalievism, Kemalism.
References: 

1. Agurskij M. Ideologija nacionalbol’shevizma [Ideology of the National Bolshevism]. – Moskva, 2003.
2. Ishakov S.M. Rossijskie musul’mane i revoljucija (vesna 1917 g. – leto 1918 g.) [Russian Muslims and the revolution (spring, 1917 – summer, 1918)]. – Moskva, 2003.
3. Masalimov R.N. «Nacional’nyj kommunizm» v Povolzh’e i na Urale (1918-1928 gg.) [«National communism» in Volga region and Urals (1918-1928)]., Istorija i istoriki v Kazanskom universitete: k 125-letiju Obshhestva arheologii, istorii i jetnografi i pri Kazanskom universitete: Sbornik nauchnyh statej i soobshhenij [History and historians in the Kazan university: to the 125th anniversary of the Archeology, History and Ethnography Society in the Kazan university: collection of scientific papers and reports]. – Part II. – Kazan’., 2005.
4. Masalimov R. «Jetnizacija» revoljucionnyh processov (Na primere Povolzh’ja i Juzhnogo Urala) [«Ethnisation» of revolutionary processes (on the example of Volga region and South Urals)]., Vatandash-Sootechestvennik-Compatriot. – 1998., No. 7.
5. Pozdjaeva S. Modernizacija kak paradigma social’nogo razvitija sovremennoj Rossii [Modernization as a paradigm of social development
of modern Russia]., Vatandash-Sootechestvennik-Compatriot. – 2011. – No. 5.
6. Stroev S. Nacional’nyj kommunizm [National communism]. – 2005., Access mode: http://www.russoc.by.ru/Doctrina/Nackom.htm.
7. Sultanbekov B. Istorija Tatarstana: Stalin i «tatarskij sled» [History of Tatarstan: Stalin and «Tatar trace»]. – Kazan’., 1992.
8. Sultangaliev M.H. Stat’i, vystuplenija, dokumenty [Articles, performances, documents]. – Kazan’., 1992.
9. Sultanov F.M. Tatarskoe nacional’noe dvizhenie: istorija i sovremennost’ [Tatar national movement: history and present]. – Kazan’, 2000.
10. Togan Zaki Validi. Vospominanija [Memoirs]., Book 1. – Ufa, 1994.
11. Bairathi Shashi. Communism and Nationalism in India: A Study in Interrelationship, 1919-1947. – Delhi, 1987.
12. Bennigsen A., Lemercier-Quelquejay Ch. Sultangaliev, le père de la revolution tiers-mondiste. – Paris., 1986.
13. Bennigsen A.A., Wimbush S.E. Muslim National Communism in the Soviet Union. – Chicago-London., 1979. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2617945
14. Carrère d’Encausse H. Islam and the Russian Empire: Reform and revolution in Central Asia. Berkeley, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187633190x01209
15. Carrère d’Encausse H. Unité prolétarienne et diversité nationale: Lénine et la théorie de l”autodétermination., Revue française de science
politique. – 1971., Vol. 21., No 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406rfsp.1971.418048
16. Gurevitz B. Un cas de communisme national en Union Soviétique: Le Poalé Zion, 1918-1928., Cahiers du Monde russe et soviétique. –
1974., Vol. XV., No 3-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/cmr.1974.1211
17. Näth M.-L. Nationalismus und Kommunismus in der Volksrepublik China., Nationalismus in der Welt: Geschichte und Gesellschaft. –
Sonderheft 8. – Göttingen., 1982.
18. Tulsiram. Soviet Policy towards Communist Movement in Asia: A Case Study of Iran. 1917-1949. – New Delhi., 1985.
19. Yaari A. Le défi national. – Vol. 1: Les théories marxistes sur la question nationale à l’épreuve de l’Histoire. – P., 1978; Vol. 2: Les
révolutions éclatées. – Paris., 1979.